Showing posts with label The Citizens. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Citizens. Show all posts

Saturday, 21 May 2016

Headlong Dramaturgy: Jeremy Herrin @ The Citz

OBSERVE THE SONS OF ULSTER MARCHING TOWARDS THE SOMME

A co-production between Citizens Theatre, Abbey Theatre, Headlong and Liverpool Everyman & Playhouse.
Those I belonged to, those I have not forgotten, the irreplaceable ones, they kept their nerve, and they died.

On 1 July 1916, the 36th (Ulster) Division took part in one of the bloodiest battles in human history. The Battle of the Somme.

One hundred years on, a major new co-production of Observe the Sons of Ulster Marching Towards the Somme directed by Headlong’s Artistic Director,Jeremy Herrin.

In the extraordinary circumstances of WWI, eight ordinary men are changed, changed utterly…

This iconic war play by Frank McGuinness is a powerful portrayal of mortality, love and loss.

What more have we to tell each other?

What was the inspiration for this performance?
The centenary of the battle of the Somme made me think it was a good time to look at the legacy of the 36th Ulster Division and the culture that resonates from that blood sacrifice, particularly after the Good Friday agreement.

How did you go about gathering the team for it?
Long arduous casting process. It's arguably the most important part of my process. 

How did you become interested in making performance in the
first place - does it hold any particular qualities that other media don't have?
The liveness of it is exciting: anything could happen and something must happen to paraphrase Perter Brook. I love the limitations that theatre places on you - to transcend them you need imagination. 

Was your process typical of the way that you make a performance? 
Yes four weeks rehearsal, lots of research, plenty of volleyball. A typically collegiate atmosphere - it's been fun

What do you hope that the audience will experience?
I hope they will find it funnier than the title suggests, I hope they mediate on identity, and I hope they are loved at this moving portrayal of this massive waste of human life. 

What strategies did you consider towards shaping this audience experience?
All the physical elements: space, light, sound. Word & body. Clarity and mystery, and the correspondence between the two. 

Do you see your work within any particular tradition?
I feel like I'm firmly in what I would call a Royal Court tradition. The primacy of the text and the maximum vocal and corporeal presence in an essentialist space. 


Tuesday, 17 May 2016

This Restless Critic

 Photo by Tim Morozzo

This Restless House isn't quite the wholesale feminist revision of The Oresteia that I might have fantasised. Zinnie Harris does a cheeky gender-swap (Orestes loses his place as the matricide to Electra) and allows Clytemnestra a more sympathetic character - helped by Pauline Knowles powerful performance. But Harris is too skilful a playwright to be blatantly ideological. It does stand as 'feminist theatre', if I must, but refuses to condemn the source trilogy explicitly.

Aeschylus' Oresteia is a rare text, managing to be really really good and shamelessly promoting an ideology. It might as well have had the subtitle The Triumph of Patriarchy. Not only does it present a state in a state, because a woman is in charge, it has a lovely denouement, in which the latest ancient Greek science reveals that mothers are not blood relatives to their children. Every so often, somebody claims that the patriarchy started with Christianity or Judaism. When I have finished shouting at them, I suggest that they learn classical Greek. 

Any contemporary interpretation has to deal with the gender politics. It's not enough to sigh that times were different then: The Oresteia offers an argument for male dominance. Even if Agamemnon turns out to be deceitful - for Harris, he gives it all the uxorious loyalty while banging a slave-girl behind Clytemnestra's back - he remains the true king. When he gets stabbed up (the worst scene in Restless House, since it ignores the Greek dictum that violence ought to happen off-stage), it's not domestic violence, but an attack on the notion of kingship.


The brilliance of This Restless House is in the final play (Electra and her Shadow). Having acted out the first and second parts in a mythical time and place that is partially ancient Greece and partially Glasgow, Harris slaps Electra into a psychiatric ward. The image of a woman captured by her past, and banged up in the straps for it, lends relevance and immediacy. Electra becomes the madwoman stuck with the bloody curse of patriarchy, and punished for her rebellion.

By killing her father - and this is a superb switch, akin to that time Euripides made Medea a child-killer (the earlier versions of her myth have the citizens of Corinth doing her kids) - Electra both accepts the obligations of ancient patriarchy and disrupts it. She might be doing the right thing, but a woman taking control: naughty.

In the person of the male psychiatrist, who ultimately holds power over Electra and her shadow (a female former patient turned rising star psychiatrist), Harris pictures soft male power. Insinuating, full of surface compassion, he goads the shadow into insanity, and makes sure that Electra remains 'untreatable'. 

Harris is smart enough (unlike me) to know that an obvious shift from male power to female power won't cut it. Instead, she exposes the bleak oppression that continues, the change in power from priests to doctors and the enervating revelation that the more things change, the more they stay the same... 


Saturday, 13 February 2016

Yeah, Beckett speaks to me so much....

Beckett probably covers more philosophical ground in his plays that
would be recognised by Scottish audiences of the past decade. Unfortunately, the combination of his estate's notorious sensitivity to interpretations and the production of those scripts which explicitly address post-apocalyptic society (Godot, Happy Days and, most recently, Endgame) provide a vision of an artist happily churning out the same metaphorical representations of alienation and a tedious, hostile universe.

It seems hardly fair to blame Dominic Hill for not bringing the full imagination of his distinctive directorial style to bear on The Citizens' production of Endgame. Had he tried to feature an ensemble cast performing live music, or rolled a few doors across the stage in his usual manner, the estate might have rescinded his right to use the script. Instead, he presents a generic Beckett, all monologues delivered in actorly tones, snarking conversations and heavily symbolic staging. Old people in dustbins and a man who cannot walk - I wonder what the subtext could be?

Because Hill could do much more with the text. Subtle hints are littered about the script suggesting that, actually, Endgame is commenting on the tedious ritual of theatre itself. The fourth wall gets tickled by some of the monologues - who else can they be addressing than the audience? Repeated mentions of 'the play', the atmosphere of repetition even around actions that, within Endgame, could only happen once (like the protagonist's mum dying, or the exhaustion of the painkillers). At one point, when he's told to stop singing, Clov replies 'but how else can this end?', a reference to the French tradition of finishing the evening with a song. 

Of course, alienation never goes out of fashion. But Endgame and Happy Days express the alienation of a specific historical period: it is after WWII, the nuclear bomb has just revealed itself and environmental devastation has just popped up. Putting aside our current government's enthusiasm for austerity and the fashionable references to post-war rationing (Keep Calm and Keep Watching Godot), the nature of alienation now does not involve a lack of stuff and a worry that the USSR and the USA are going to slap each other around until there's just a blank wilderness outside. 

Even giving Clov and Hamm hipster beards would be a start...


Wednesday, 18 March 2015

For Elliot Roberts: EIF Theatre

Perhaps we have to admit that our pessimism was misplaced. Untitled are bringing Justified Sinner to the EIF. It was lucky that I was alone when I found out: my little dance of delight would have been embarrassing in public.

This is my quick reply to the Edinburgh International Festival's announcement of their theatre programme. Not only does it feature stuff that I have not seen before (I mean, I love the Wooster Group, but they just kept coming back...), it has a strand that makes me happy.

Celebrating great Scottish work and artists, this year’s Festival offers people the world première of Alasdair Gray’s Lanark in a production by the Citizens Theatre written and directed by David Greig and Graham Eatough... alongside opportunities for locals and international visitors to see two existing, very successful works, Dragon and Untitled Project’s and the National Theatre of Scotland’s Paul Bright’s Confessions of a Justified Sinner directed by Stewart Laing, showcased at the Festival.

fergus linehan
So, right, yeah, there is this joke in Confessions that the 'Scottish slot' in the EIF is, like, fatal to Scottish companies - mainly because they have to put on a new work, and the pressure is great, and it tends to be a disappointment and...

...reviving Confessions answers this, giving space to an established piece (that is critically acclaimed): the EIF is actually showing the world what is going on in Scotland. 


New festival director Fergus Linehan is alright by me.

Tuesday, 3 March 2015

Rum and Vodka @ Citz

Citizens Theatre presents Rum and VodkaBy Conor McPherson
5 – 7 March, 8PM
Circle studio
Citizens Theatre


Rum and Vodka by the multi-award winning McPherson, most famous for his 1999 play The Weir, will be directed by Birkbeck Trainee Director Stephen Darcy and star Citizens Theatre Actor Intern Martin Donaghy. 

Rum and Vodka tells the story of one young man and his three-day alcohol-fueled rampage around Dublin. Exasperated with his mundane nine-to-five existence he embarks on a path of self-destruction in an unorthodox quest for redemption. 

Written when McPherson was only 21, Rum and Vodka sparkles with an energy, wit and brutal honesty that prefigures the playwright’s later successes including an Oliver Award for Best New Play for The Weir and New York Drama Critics Circle Award for The Night Alive.



The one-man show is directed by Stephen Darcy who is currently on a year-long placement at the Citizens Theatre as part of the Theatre Directing MFA at Birkbeck University. 

Since beginning his placement in autumn 2014, he has worked with Citizens Theatre Artistic Director Dominic Hill on A Christmas Carol as Assistant Director and on Hill’s production of Hamlet

Assuming the role of the hopeless antihero is Martin Donaghy, Citizens Theatre’s Actor Intern, a position sponsored by the Robertson Scholarship Trust. Donaghy graduated from Royal Conservatoire of Scotland in 2014 and has already starred in Citizens Theatre main stage productions of Hamlet as Horatio and A Christmas Carol as Bob Cratchit.



Describing Rum and Vodka, Darcy says: “I’m really excited to be directing my first production at the Citizens Theatre. Rum and Vodka is a remarkably funny yet poignant piece of writing by one of the most exciting and influential living playwrights today. The intimate scale of the Circle Studio naturally lends itself to a very personal and immediate retelling of this tragicomedy where the audience become immersed in the protagonist’s recounting of his chaotic binge through Dublin.”



Tickets are available from 0141 429 0022  citz.co.uk

Thursday, 8 January 2015

Mugstock: The Garden: Korean Architecture



MugStock will offer a unique blend of live entertainment and activities such as pond dipping, castle tours, guided walks, woodland rambles, survival, storytelling, mountain biking, willow weaving and archery.

Mugdock Country Park Joint Management Committee is hugely supportive of the project.

Councillor Eric Gotts, Chair of the Committee, said, "We are very pleased that the organisers have chosen the wonderful surrounds of Mugdock to host this very special event.

"It's an exciting idea and has the potential to offer increased visitor numbers to the park, new audiences and a fresh way to enjoy one of Scotland's finest natural attractions."

Mugdock currently receives over 600,000 visitors each year and hopes are high that more visitors will be attracted from Glasgow, Stirling and beyond.

Alan Govan, who conceived the idea five years ago while visiting the park with his wife, added, "MugStock is a not-for-profit festival and we are all working on a voluntary basis, so our hearts are really in it to create an event which showcases the park itself while being something special for festival-goers."

Organisers expect 2,000 campers to attend the inaugural event on 7th - 9th August and are optimistic about launching with an Indie GoGo campaign next month.




Wednesday, 3 September 2014

The Performance Geography of Glasgow: The Southside



Although The Citizens Theatre has been, in various incarnations, on the same site since 1878 (becoming the Citizens in 1945 with the arrival of James Bridie’s company), The Southside is not over-burden with theatrical venues. Across from the Citizens is the O2 Academy, predominantly a club and gig venue but also the home of Club Noir, the biggest burlesque club in the world (Guinness Book of Records, 2011). Further south is Tramway, a space rediscovered by Peter Brook for his Mahabharata  in 1988 and subsequently a major venue during 1990’s City of Culture festival: Scottish Ballet recently added an extension to Tramway, making it their base. At the very edge of the city, Eastwood Park Theatre hosts medium scale touring shows.

Each of these venues has a distinctive identity. Following from the iconic regime of the ‘triumvirate’ of Giles Havergal, Philip Prowse and Robert David MacDonald (1969 - 2003), The Citizens became internationally recognised for its daring interpretations of Classic plays, including translations of writers often neglected in the UK. MacDonald, a playwright himself, is more celebrated for his translations, including those of Goldoni and Brecht.

Current artistic director Dominic Hill has continued this theme, staging versions of King Lear, Hamlet and Pinter’s Betrayal, as well as commissioning an adaptation of Crime and Punishment  from Chris Hannan. Less interested in new writing, despite Hill’s previous role at Edinburgh’s Traverse, The Citizens maintains a strong connection to its local community, through cheap ticket opportunities.


Tramway is known internationally for presenting experimental theatre from around the world. Apart from its long association with Peter Brook - a regular visitor in the 1990s, and returning in 2010 with 11 and 12, Tramway invited companies like Victoria and Les Ballets C de La B from Belgium, Robert Lepage from Quebec and Forced Entertainment from Sheffield to take advantage of their flexible main space. 

Thanks to the wall built by Brook for The Mahabharata, Tramway has a unique atmosphere. Rescued from demolition and also housing a huge main gallery for visual art, it still bears the traces of its previous use as a garage for Glasgow’s trams and the Museum for Transport, linking it to the city’s industrial past. It has a reputation for adventurous programming, but has recently began to support local, emerging artists, primarily through its Rip It Up Seasons.

Eastwood Park, meanwhile, is often the forgotten theatre in surveys
of Glasgow. Positioned at the point where Glasgow meets East Renfrewshire - an independent county - it has featured touring productions from Rapture (based in The Briggait), Random Accomplice (The CCA) as well as The Reduced Shakespeare Company. 

Tuesday, 2 September 2014

Don Juan, Relevance Nil

Gareth K Vile like Don but struggles to understand what it has to say to him

EVENT REVIEW BY GARETH K VILE.
PUBLISHED IN THE SKINNY 05 OCTOBER 2008

Apart from an unsatisfying introduction, which attempts to act as an expressionist overture but ends up as vulgar mime with a burst of unnecessary nudity, this up-dating of Don Juan is sharply directed, well acted and concisely staged. Mark Springer’s sprightly Juan is sympathetic and dashing, the set is balanced between detail and suggestiveness, and the original play’s tight plotting paces the action and humour. It is a fun-packed romp that showcases pair of skilful directors and an imaginative modern translation of Goldoni’s classic.

At the same time, it feels purposeless. The central tension at the heart of Don Juan’s drama – the battle between desire and society, spiritual warfare and sensual pleasure – is barely relevant to a society that has fixated on celebrity and abandoned church because it interrupts the hangover. Bringing it up to date only heightens the irrelevance: Juan’s modern counterpart is not a lover but a businessman swine, and the late appearance of two (probably trafficked) European prostitutes casts a depressing shadow over Juan’s seductions.

Against the harsh modern commerce of sex, Don Juan makes no sense. The object of his devotion, Anna, comes across as strident, not pious. Her relationship with her father looks incestuous, not dutiful: while this might echo the filial attitudes of some women, it is a matter for psychological evaluation, not admiration. And Juan’s romps aren’t funny when they are repositioned as rape. The speeches to the audience are half-hearted justifications, and only serve to emphasise how little this play has to say any more.

But it is well-crafted. It has handsome performances, for the most part. It provides spectacle, imaginative stage-craft and doesn’t out-stay its welcome. Stripped of the rather silly hospital scene, it is a rapid-fire pleasure. Sadly, it doesn’t add anything to any modern debate, ending up rather as the live equivalent of a soap opera.

Monday, 1 September 2014

The Glasgow School XX Calendar for September

If Glasgow's theatre communities can be bounded by the geographical limits of the city, there is also an annual calendar of events that has become reasonably stable over the past five years. Despite the emergence and disappearance of festivals (Radiance shone briefly in the mid-2000s, The National Review of Live Art was wound up after thirty years in 2010), a relatively settled programme has developed.

September
After the hurly-burly of the Edinburgh Fringe, Arches Live!  is the traditional start to the autumn seasons. Ranging from a week to a month's worth of performances, installations and exhibitions - sometimes including a 'take over' of the restaurant by a selected artist - the festival is curated by Jackie Wylie and features a host of mainly local and emerging artists.

2013 programme
Art/Action/Other #1 (discussion event)
Rachel Frances Sharpe: Smoke
Unboxed: Break the Silence
Leo Glaister: Ultraviolet Catastrophe
Calum MacAskill: Every Pound’s A Prisoner!
Greg Sinclair: I Do, Do I
Peter Lannon/Emma Nutland: Punching Woman Coming At You Punchman
V/DA: Behave
Enormous Yes: Bonny Boys Are Few
Ian Johnston/Gary Gardiner/Adrian Howells: He’s The Greatest Dancer
Rosana Cade: Sister
Louise Ahl: NICE Opening Ceremony
Arches Commons breakfast discussion: Am I An Artist?
Visting Company: Panorama
Katy Baird and Jonathan May: At Least We Tried
Unboxed: I’m Still Gay And You’re Still Dying
Shafted!? Theatrical Dissidents: Shafted!?

Since The Arches offers a season ticket, and most events have short runs, Arches Live! is close to a music festival in structure. It encourages works in progress (the versions of Sister and I Do, Do I would later be expanded for the 2014 Edinburgh Fringe) and young artists, making their first works outside of academia (Peter Lannon is a recent graduate of the RCS). It has a DIY atmosphere, with multiple events on the same night, and discussions are part of the overall programme.

September marks the beginning of the seasons for the producing house theatres  - The Tron and The Citizens - and the Tramway, which mixes touring productions and festivals. 

September 2014 also sees the arrival of Arika's Episode 6: Make a Way Out of No Way. Although the company are based in Edinburgh, and were previously preoccupied with festivals of experimental music, Arika has become increasingly concerned with work across the entire spectrum of performance. Their Episodes combine theatre, live art, music, lectures and discussions around a particular theme. Episode 6 looks at 'queer black art,' following earlier Episodes that took the New York Ballroom scene as a cue for a wide-ranging exploration of dance and queer subculture.

As for The Citizens and The Tron: the respective kick-offs to their autumn seasons might give some clues towards their unique identities. 

The Citizens has two whopping great shows - Headlong's 1984 and artistic director Dominic Hill's Hamlet. Hill's thoughts on his Hamlet give further clues. “Hamlet’s grief, loss of trust, the complexity of his family relationships and how he negotiates the abrupt changes to his world around him are challenges that contemporary audiences can relate to. Brian Ferguson is a thoughtful and sensitive actor, whom I really wanted for this production, which will focus on Hamlet’s internal struggles and the domestic drama between two families. Shakespeare at the Citz is always a special event, and I'm looking forward to presenting a production that adds to that rich history.” 

The emphasis on a contemporary reading of a classic - the centrality of the actor (Brian Ferguson, who is becoming a major Scottish player - the sense of an occasion and the legacy of previous performances.

The Tron, meanwhile, waits a while before its big opening - a Chekhov via Scotland - and has a selection of short runs of proven plays (Full Tilt, which wowed Oran Mor, The Carousel, a Traverse Fringe Festival entry, a few comedians and gigs, plus Alan Bissett's political pantomime. 


(As a bonus, here's a one-off in Edinburgh for September 2014. Does this give context to the stability of the Glasgow month? Or do I just like the picture?
credit:Mark Hamilton



Blabbermouth
The Assembly Hall, Edinburgh on 17 September 2014, midday to midnight

A live twelve-hour celebration of Scottish music and spoken word, read, sung and performed by its people, between midday and midnight.

Featuring invited artists, actors, politicians, journalists, sportspeople, singers and scientists.



Sunday, 31 August 2014

Mary Brennan talks Citz, 1984

As a coda to what the Citizens' is  about (a reflection too of Giles Havergal's yearning for a Globe-type audience... here is one of his favourite anecdotes. 

When the tenements were still standing, a fat, rather unprepossessing old woman used to watch the company going in and out, day after day. On the night of the free preview, Havergal was surprised to see the old dear waddle in with her young grandson. 'They sat in the stalls, she got out a thermos, gave him a drink, hit him over the head for talking.

At the interval I thought, 'they'll go'. But no, they stayed.' 

And the play that held their attention? The Duchess Of  Malfi.

(Mary Brennan, Theatre Ireland, No. 5 (Dec., 1983 - Mar., 1984), pp. 60-64)

Mary Brennan's article about The Citizen's Theatre in 1984 begins with a photograph of the venue as it was then - standing alone in a derelict waste ground. Through interviews with both the creative team and company manager Paul Bassett, she describes how, despite its location, the theatre thrived through cheap ticket prices and a diet of imaginative interpretations of classic texts.

Although The Citizens has a book dedicated to its history, Brennan's piece is a snapshot that explains why the venue, and the tenure of Giles Havergal, is so fondly remembered. Contrasting the strategies of Havergal, Robert David MacDonald and Philip Prowse ('the gang of three') with those of other reps who took their cues from London, Brennan identifies their approach and success.

Where other reps will look to London's West End for a play (and 
often an identikit production) they hope will 'take', the Citz will ferret out a neglected Goldoni. Robert David MacDonald will burnish it up in a new translation, they'll stage it with a commendable lack of false and stifling reverence and a delighted audience will suddenly find that Goldoni's observation on people and social behaviour are enduringly relevant and funny. 
(page 62)

Pondering their influences, Brennan observes a 'confident theatricality more redolent of the European than the British stage,' before listing their international touring programme. She also mentions the 'enviable reputation for exciting and original design,' a quality that would be found in later Citizens' alumni such as Kenny Miller and Stewart Laing. 


Venue of the Month: The Citizens

TOMMY GA-KEN WAN
The Skinny speaks to Dominic Hill, artistic director of the Citz
FEATURE BY GARETH K VILE.
PUBLISHED IN THE SKINNY 02 JANUARY 2013


Last year, the arrival of Dominic Hill as artistic director of the Citizens was greeted with delight. Charging straight in with three heavy-weight numbers – King Lear, Betrayal by Pinter and a Beckett double bill – Hill was making a clear announcement that his leadership would continue the legendary era of Giles Havergal, Philip Prowse and Robert David MacDonald (1969- 2003), when the company became famous for reinterpreting classic texts in a funky, modern style.

After a successful Autumn Season, which saw Hill take a back seat as Glasgow Girls reimagined musical theatre as politically vibrant, the Spring Season seems to be taking the original promise forward. Hill's having a crack at Doctor Faustus, one of the few plays from the Elizabethan era to have a reputation that matches a Shakespeare, Stewart Laing is getting busy with The Maids – Laing's maverick style perfect for Genet's snide look at power hierarchies and the failed holiness of the criminal – as well as bringing back his Salon Project, which dresses the audience up in period clobber. Meanwhile, a team-up with the Lyceum has Donna Franceschild replay her TV drama Taking Over the Asylum on the stage. The season ends with another Hill direction, a pair of Caryl Churchills – Churchill has been called the greatest living playwright and has a scathing feminist bite to her writing.

Hill is clearly making sure that the Citizens has a clear identity. Over the years – it opened as Her Majesty's in the late ninetenth century – it has been mercurial: sometimes known for its democratic inclusiveness (cheap tickets for local residents, the foundation of a theatre company based on an early draft for a Scottish national theatre), its excellent work for young people (TAG is still an important part of the brand) or, as from 1969, a hotbed for experiment with the classics of British theatre.

Without necessarily going the whole ‘new writing’ route – it is clear that The Traverse in Edinburgh is enthusiastic on this – Hill's season sees theatre as contemporary and relevant. His Faustus promises a swipe at consumerism, and Churchill's Far Away is a dystopian horror that demonstrates how visceral a script can be.

But it is The Maids that kicks off the year. Stewart Laing might come from a familiar Scottish tradition of the director who designs, but his recent productions have seen him deconstruct the very nature of performance. The Salon Project mixed up the talents of visual artists, costumiers and public thinkers and by taking on Genet's story of two women who would like to be glorious killers, he is grappling with one of France's most sensational authors.

Moving into February, as a contrast, there is the anti-sectarian Divided City, directed by Guy Hollands, who has been making work for the venue for the best part of this decade. Although taking place over in Hamilton, it is a fine example of how the new Citizens is not afraid to reach out and tackle a tough problem.

With Hill delivering on his promises, Hollands moving out into the community, and Laing breaking various social taboos and theatrical presumptions, the Citizens is looking healthy. There's plenty of nonsense written about how the venue reflects its Gorbel's location – tough, determined, whatever – but here's a programme that is setting the pace for performance that respects the old and enters the new. [Gareth K. Vile]

Thursday, 21 August 2014

The Glasgow School VII: The Citizens Theatre

In the universe according to Wikipedia, The Citizens is 'the principal producing theatre in the west of Scotland.' The article goes on to note that it had some controversy in the 1970s, both for nudity in a production of Hamlet and an act of solidarity with striking workers (free entry to anyone with a valid trade union card). It has a reputation, thanks to the long tenure of Gile Havergil as artistic director, for staging experimental plays, and provocative interpretations of classics and, not least due to its name, a strong connection to the surrounding population of Gorbals.

It is currently under the artistic direction of Dominic Hill (described by critic Mark Brown as having a 'talent for classical drama which is genuinely world class... Hill’s highly imaginative, transfixing productions of classic plays by such authors as Shakespeare, Beckett, Howard Barker and Edward Albee mark him out as the best director to have worked in Scotland since Giles Havergal'). Hill's time has seen acclaimed productions of Beckett, Shakespeare's King Lear and an adaptation of Crime and Punishment.

The Citizens also provides a home for Untitled Projects, the company of maverick director and designer Stuart Laing. 

Programming at The Citizens represents a lineage that reaches back to Shakespeare. Hill - following his predecessors Havergill and Jeremy Raison - selects works that are part of the English language's canon, international scripts and commissions new work from established playwrights. Recent seasons have seen Pinter (Betrayal) and Ibsen (via a version from Zinnie Harris, Miss Julie) alongside a carefully selected set of guest companies who, like Filter with their gig influenced Twelfth Night, often parallel Hill's iconoclastic approach to classic texts. 

Throughout the years, The Citizens has had special offers, encouraging audiences that would not usually go to theatre. Their latest strategy is 'tickets for a pound,' which leads to long queues on the day of release, and headlines. 

Hill does have a distinctive directorial style - it acknowledges influences from post-dramatic theatre by frequently introducing microphones for monologues, has a very Brechtian attitude to scenography whilst using the cast sometimes in the manner of a Greek chorus - but his programming includes enough recognisable plays to hint at a sharp eye for marketing. His Hamlet is a crwod-pleasing choice (coming in September 2014), but as much for the possibilities that Hill might apply as for the script itself. 

Thank you to Steven Thomson for the geographical correction.

Tuesday, 27 May 2014

Krapp's Last Tape and Footfalls.

The Citizens Theatre presents Dominic Hill's new production, two plays by Samuel Beckett: Krapp's Last Tape and Footfalls.
PREVIEW BY GARETH K VILE.
PUBLISHED 01 JUNE 2012
Dominic Hill's first season as artistic director at The Citizens has been a clear statement of intent. While he promises a few surprises in the next year, his 'trilogy' of serious scripts – Pinter's BetrayalKing Learand finally the Beckett double bill of Krapp's Last Tape and Footfalls – announced that Hill was not only playing to his strengths as an interpreter of texts but continuing the tradition that made The Citizens a producing powerhouse in the late twentieth century.
Hill is more than willing to challenge himself. "I felt we needed to say that we are about putting on the greatest writers in the world: and so – Pinter, Shakespeare, Beckett. My motive for becoming a director was reading plays as a student and saying, I want to see this! I still get that thrill when I read a good play."
Kay Gillie – who is taking on an unusual role in Footfalls (her character never comes on stage) – adds that there is a new energy in the building. "It is an amazing atmosphere and there is always so much going on," she says. "It really is a hive of creativity. You meet actors you have not seen for ages and get the chance to chat about different productions. It is a very stimulating place to be."
As the final production of the season, a Beckett double bill is a brave choice. By casting Gerard Murphy as the titular hero, Hill brings back an actor who made his name at The Citizens in the 1970s, deliberately recalling the theatre's glory days. And Beckett – a rare example of a modern playwright who is both popular and experimental – is well known enough for Hill's version to be compared to recent productions.
Gillie, fresh from The Steamie's successful tour directed by Tony Roper, admits "I am definitely a Beckett fan," having played "woman" in The Arches' production of Rockabye. And while Beckett is known as a writer, his use of theatre goes far beyond the script: the tactic of keeping one character off-stage, Gillie adds, "is part of a range of classic Beckett style elements. It is part of something larger. For me the role also still requires that connection with the live theatre audience. This is what makes Beckett so special."

Tuesday, 21 May 2013

Old Eggs


It’s a stunning script, torn from the author’s experience of bringing up a severely disabled child. It takes the traditional soliloquy and electrifies it with stand-up comedy and music hall routines, shattering the fourth wall and allowing the actors to connect directly with the audience. It revels in uncomfortable humour and draws complex characterisation from possible stereotypes – the failing teaching, the manipulative mother-in-law. It even presents a public debate, complete with unsavoury bigotry, on an apparently intractable problem. It flickers between genres, refuses a pat finale and shows compassion to nearly all of the characters.

That A Day in the Death of Joe Egg was written in 1967, when the stage was still subject to censorship is not necessarily a cause for celebration. There has been little writing since that is so sharp, so complete, so precise. A litany of its qualities reads like a check-list for contemporary drama’s ambitions.

Not being a proper scholar, and lacking access to the latest texts on theatre practice – my disappointment is tempered by their apparent fascination with “getting back to the roots” and blathering on about tangentially related performance – my library is dominated by second hand books that were terribly modern in 1975. Having grown up as an enthusiast for radical, devised theatre, mainly thanks to the imaginative programming at Tramway by Steve Slater, these references tend to miss many of the processes that have defined my experience. Devised work is lumped together in a category called “Fringe”, alongside agit-prop, rock opera and happenings. The script is still king in 1975: one preface moans that the Arts Council has recently suggested that language is not necessarily at the heart of theatre.

I often say that “I hate scripts.” Yes, it’s a lazy line, a slogan that I roll out when I am about to explain why I am rather fond of David Harrower, or think Dunsinane is David Greig’s most important play. And there is a great deal of “performance” in my critical persona. I never really mean what I say when I am making proclamations: for the record, I have big ideas but struggle to articulate them, knowing that they inevitably contradict each other. When I say “I hate scripts”, I am really repeating the Arts Council’s 1970s declaration that they don’t necessarily form the foundation of theatre, plus a vague complaint that they are given too much emphasis. Oh, and that I have seen too many Shakespeare remixes that have little justification beyond another outing for the Bard’s poetry.
A Day in the Death... is one of those awkward plays that highlights the stupidity of my published catch-phrase. Any reservations I have about it are down to its original cultural context – the do-gooder industrialist socialist is a stereotype I cannot recognise, his wife is a cruel two dimensional bitch, and the best lines do go to the guys. It doesn’t really give a vision of the family that I can recognise – a stay at home mother? But as The Citizens’ production demonstrates, it is willing to address a serious question and still keep the jokes flowing. Writer Peter Nichols told director Philip Breen to go for comedy, not Strindberg. Yet the compassion at the centre ensures that the gags don’t become a nasty rush of spastic humour – and thanks for Ricky Gervais for bringing that one up again, to boost his flagging career and advertise his particular soullessness.

If anything, Breen is reverential of the text: he spoke at a post-show discussion about locating his version in a pop-art late 1960s, and his cast aren’t always comfortable getting down with the audience. Miles Jupp kicks off well, using them as his unruly class, and Miriam Margoyles offers a master-class as the mother-in-law: it may have been her excellence that kept her from being a one-note joke, culled from Bernard Manning’s Greatest Jibes. But Breen does bring out the comedy, holds the pathos gently. The choice not to update the action makes this a museum piece, but suits the production. A more modern take would have opened up questions about the different attitudes we now have to disability, weakening the bold strokes of the moral debate (should Joe Egg be offed?).

Of course, I am not suggesting for one moment that the play offers any special insight into disability. The real drama lies in the way that Joe Egg’s parents battle, and how Joe becomes a symbol of an intractable problem that neither science nor religion can handle and an icon for the parents’ personal failures. The father is a moral coward – his final escape is craven, somehow more morally objectionable than his attempted murder of the child. And times have changed: a piece like Girl X, created by Robert Softly, is a more bracing take on contemporary attitudes.

The Citizens are offering something important: the chance to see a classic of British Theatre, in an unfussy interpretation. It allows the script to shine – something new Citz’s artistic director Dominic Hill will appreciate, since he is all about the writing – and sets the author’s interests front and centre. Not only does this ensure that the casual audience – by this, I mean people who still cling to theatre as entertainment, not their profession – will be attracted, it offers an opportunity for anyone working in theatre to see a classic work in a clear production. There’s plenty of food for thought in A Day in the Death..., both in terms of its look at social attitudes to disability and the potential of the script as... the foundation of drama.

Footnote: Ah. I have noticed that I have fallen into one of my own traps here. I am banging on about the “theatricality” of A Day in the Death and not fully engaging with its broader social impact. I am especially guilty because it deliberately deals with an issue, and had quite a big impact in the 1970s. There’s space for a different article, that thinks about how it addresses disability, and lets dad off the hook for trying to kill his daughter. And while the most vociferous advocate of euthanasia is a caricature and obviously unsympathetic, there’s no positive reason given to keep Joe alive. The disabled daughter is an object, passed from person to person. The entire drama depends on this. That might be too.. conservative for me.
I have also added to this by calling Josephine, the child, “Joe Egg”, conflating the title and the character. If you’ve seen the play, you’ll understand why. If you haven’t... well, be a dear and see it before responding. 
-- 

Tuesday, 15 January 2013

Murderous Transvestites fight Single Mothers

January used to be such a lovely, quiet month. Thanks to Celtic Connections, the arts programmers of Scotland have unfortunately realised that there is an audience for performance after Christmas, mostly people wanted to forget the nightmare of family gatherings. And so both the Lyceum and the Citizens are kicking off early with blasts from the past, staging works that have a nice blend of awkwardness and passion.

A Taste of Honey is a wise choice for the Lyceum. Back in the 1950s, it was shocking - single mothers, racism, social exclusion, untamed passions. The Lyceum's programme has always been strong on the revival of classic plays, but has increasingly had a rougher edge. Meanwhile, The Maids at the Citizens is even more hardcore: it's French, the author was a convicted criminal and its gender politics are dizzying.

But which of these two is the winner in the January sales? Will Genet's tale of murder and power best Delaney's insight into working class despair and hope? Does The Maids reveal more about the interior world of the criminal, or does Honey express a more vivid existential torment? Judging both plays in six categories, it's time to find out whether the Citizens or the Lyceum are more likely to attract an audience looking for controversy.


Social Relevance
Despite being over five decades old, A Taste of Honey grapples with issues still live today. The heroine is a single mother, and the tension between mother and daughter is as relevant now as it was in the 1950s. Some of the themes - racism, the impact of poverty on opportunity and ambition - might have different contours in 2013, but A Taste of Honey puts them on stage for serious consideration.
The Maids might be based on a true story - although Genet makes it all his own - but its fundamental social conflict is based around a master/servant dynamic. It might give David Cameron a few nightmares when he gets an insight into the thoughts of the home help, but The Maids races off into a very specific narrative that does not necessarily claim any universality.
Winner: ATaste of Honey

Historical Significance
A Taste of Honey came at that point when theatre audiences were ready for a bit more than well-made plays about the middle-classes. It stands as a pointer to the development of English realism, culminating in the neo-brutalists, who gave the script a visceral edge more familiar from Live Art.  Without Delaney and "the angry young men", there would be no Trainspotting and social realism would be a Soviet genre of visual art, not an important strand of British cinema and art. Even better, it presents, if not a documentary, a creative description of British working class life in the olden days.
It's more difficult to assess The Maids in a historical context: I don't know enough about French culture, and Genet's personal history sets him outside any mainstream I can imagine. He does herald the more brutal aspects of contemporary theatre, and his emphasis on theatre as ritual (admittedly more obvious in other plays) links him into the move away from the script as an imitation of life than a philosophical meditation.
Winner by a nose: A Taste of Honey

Gender Politics
Delaney manages to focus her play on female characters - looking at the history of the English theatre, this is no mean feat. By representing their problems in a relatively objective manner - it's surprising how little moralising is directed at the characters - she made a major step forward in the sort of stories that could be told. Without patronisingly labelling Honey a feminist classic, it is nevertheless a bit more sorted than the stuff coming out of the 1940s, or Shakespeare.
The Maids has female characters played by men. Director Stewart Laing has said that he wants to look at the way masculinity operates in the play but the actual gender and sexual antics written into the script make this one where identity can't be ignored.
Winner by confusing the issue: The Maids

Rock'n'Roll
The rock'n'roll era was defined by the rise of the teenager. America got Elvis, England got Delaney, who wrote this when she was eighteen. Of course, the escapism that marked Elvis' swinging pelvis as a threat is replaced by an altogether more fertile male nether regions, which get the heroine up the stick. The seriousness of Honey was not to enter rock'n'roll until Lou Reed hooked up with Andy Warhol...
... and The Velvet Underground are in the soundtrack of Laing's version of The Maids. Genet's vision of crime has inspired plenty of musicians, and the mayhem of the script give it the psychedelic edge that popular music would embrace in the 1960s. David Bowie might have worked out his career from a stage direction or margin note to The Maids.
Winner: The Maids

Dark Poetry
For Honey, birth becomes a matter of despair, but the tone is serious and stern. There's little magic in the down-and-out, and being a weak lover or a domineering mother has little glamour.
Seriously, Genet evolved an inverted Catholicism, where the murder became like a saint. There's delirium, the glamour of execution, an erotic fixation on role play, orgasms and brutal fantasies, all given a patina of cool.
Winner: The Maids

Audience Baiting
The Lyceum might have a reputation for staging old school classics, but A Taste of Honey fits in with their recent trend towards the rough stuff. Slipped in between Shakespeare remixes and refits of Scottish novels, their more vigorous choices have the potential to irritate some loyal audience members. To be fair, I've seen the crowd take the bloodshed caused by a renegade terrorist in good spirit, but this does challenge the idea of the Lyceum as a soft touch.
The Citizens has a reputation for experimental numbers: Giles Havergil made his name with nudity in Shakespeare, and Dominic Hill didn't spare the horses for his first season. The Maids makes perfect sense in their programme.
Winner: A Taste of Honey


Conclusion: yes, of course I fixed it to be a draw. I think they are both worth going to see. 


A TASTE OF HONEY
Lyceum Theatre, Edinburgh 18 January- 9 February 2013


The Maids

Citizens Theatre, Glasgow 17 Jan – 2 Feb 2013