Showing posts with label Loki. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Loki. Show all posts

Wednesday, 6 January 2016

History Repeats Itself in Architecture

Although there's plenty to dislike in Loki's analysis of The Glasgow Effect (not least his description of an monolithic establishment that secretly undermines working class culture: there's actually a series of different elites that compete to do that), he makes a salient point about the way that building is used to destroy communities.

...common land is handed to private developers, regardless of what locals think and public spaces are locked up at weekends due to funding cuts while suburban Scotland frequents the swanky shopping village now perched on the periphery of these criminally under-resourced communities.

These shopping districts, super-imposed on the receding cultural landscape, are hailed as the solution to poverty and are always given new names which subtly disown the heritage, history and people of the local area – who now work there for peanuts.

Passionately expressed, Loki's description, sadly, is a contemporary take on an ancient narrative. Architecture and public building projects have been used by dominant cultures to establish their power throughout history. In his TV show about the Romans, comedy evil genius Boris Johnson described how the empire would build a forum in occupied cities, a reminder both of their power and practical skills (he memorably compares them to modern shopping malls). Marvin Carlson comments that while democratic fifth century Athens was a maze of narrow streets, the subsequent Hellenistic monarchies liked 'sweeping avenues', an enthusiasm shared by the French absolute monarchy a millennium and a half later.

For the entry of Charles VI into Paris in 1380 the streets and squares were hung with so many tapestries that they resembled temples, and from many artificial fountains, milk, water and wine flowed... not only decorative and allegorical purposes but, as Konigsen observed, also functioned 'to superimpose on the actual city a idealized path, while removing the lived space'. (Places of Performance, pg 22).

The appearance of perspective in painting during the Renaissance led to it being adopted by the Medici as a symbol of their 'egocentric ordering of knowledge' - Henri II entered Lyon in 1548 with parts of the city screened off by paintings that hid the medieval town behind trompe d'oeil, as if making explicit how the 'new' perspective replaces the old. The development of baroque urban planning took notes from the scenography of the theatre, a reminder that the landscape, especially in cities, is more closely connected to art than to simple functionality.

Loki's argument that the rage against Ellie Harrison is based on a disconnect between the art establishment and the working classes attempts to load social grievances onto a specific instance. The architecture of Glasgow, however, is a far more comprehensive example of the disconnect between bodies that control public funding and the people who live in the city. 

The massive motorway through the city centre? The M74? The Tesco Expresses on the street-corners, those out-of-town shopping centres? Or, to take an example presented by one of Loki's mates, the way in which Dublin has become a consumerism dystopia. All of these are more explicit, more obvious and more oppressive expressions of capitalism's power.

Critiquing these would also have the added bonus of not encouraging a baying mob hurling misogynistic abuse at a single artist.



Monday, 4 January 2016

The Glasgow Effect: Band-wagon Jumping with GKV

Oh my God! This is the first time ever that my Facebook feed has been dominated by a single topic. Nearly every post has got a picture of some chips and the message that Ellie Harrison is embarking on a project called The Glasgow Effect

And I don't know enough to have an opinion yet... but I do know that every Glasgow hard-man of art is having a crack at her. 

But I did an interview with Ellie before Christmas because the vile arts is always one step ahead. I am going to reprint her words here because, maybe, it will provide more information about who she is and what her work involves. 


The Radical Renewable Art + Activism Fund (RRAAF) is a new and autonomous alternative funding scheme initiated by artistEllie Harrison and supported by 157 backers of a successful Kickstarter campaign (now the "RRAAF Founders"):rraafund.org/kickstarter

Once set up, RRAAF will use a wind turbine to generate energy to fund a ‘no strings attached’ grant scheme for art-activist projects in the UK.

The RRAAF project concept will be launched in Glasgow during December 2015 with a series of publicity stunts featuring the "RRAAF Mascot" – on Thursday 3rd outside Mono Cafe Bar as part of The Only Way is Ethics and on Thursday 10th outside the CCA Glasgow for ArtCOP Scotland.
These will culminate in this Launch Event at the CCA on Thursday 17th December 2015, 18:30 – 20:00. The event is FREE and open to all and will feature presentations and discussion by Ellie Harrison, Georgy Davis from Community Energy Scotlandand some of the RRAAF Founders, as they outline the plan for making the RRAAF project a reality in the coming years.


That was the project she was talking about. Now some words from her. 


Since the start of the global financial crisis in 2008, my work has focussed on researching, exposing and challenging the workings of our economic system. This has led me to develop an expanded practice that now encompasses both art projects / performances (see Anti-Capitalist Aerobics and The Other Forecast), and direct political campaigning (see Bring Back British Rail, the campaign for the public ownership of our railways I have been running since 2009).

In 2013-4, I took part in Campaign Lab - a nine-month ‘economic justice’ campaigning course coordinated by the New Economics Foundation in London. Since then, and in the wake of continued cuts to public funding for the arts, I have become interested in developing a new model for an alternative funding system, which offers a real working alternative, as well as a critique of the status quo: highlighting how current funding sources for art (from commercial sponsorship to state investment) can influence its content, sometimes to the detriment.

And so the idea for the Radical Renewable Art + Activism Fund (RRAAF) was born! Once set up, RRAAF will use a wind turbine to generate renewable energy to fund a ‘no strings attached’ grant scheme for art-activist projects.

In summer 2015, I started developing the RRAAF project identity with Glasgow-based designer Neil McGuire with the support of Beaconsfield Londonand CCA Glasgow, launching the RRAAF concept and Kickstarter in autumn - winter 2015, through a series of publicity stunts and public events in London and Glasgow as part of ArtCOP21The Only Way is Ethics and ArtCOP Scotland

These will culminate in the Launch Event at CCA Glasgow this 17 December 2015 (6:30pm), where I will present the outcomes of the scoping work funded through the Kickstarter together with Georgy Davis from Community Energy Scotland


Loki, I'll be expecting a comment in couplets, please. Then we can have a rap battle or something.

Tuesday, 17 March 2015

Doubt, part 47


The National Must Have Heard My Plea...

WHO owns and creates culture? All the books, music, images, media that make up our lives – who has the authority to decide what qualifies as art?

Thanks to Loki for flagging this one up: after my complaint that The National does not have enough art coverage, Michael Gray has penned a meditation on the 'ownership' of culture. 

After a spot of throat clearing (there are constant arguments about what qualifies to be taught in school or exhibited as public art), he goes on to provide no answer but to summarise the conflict between rapper Loki and the complacent consensus in the Scottish arts.

I thought Loki was challenging the National Collective, not an abstract ideal of the arts establishment. I do hope this euphemistic use of language isn't an attempt to make the particular abstract, avoiding the very specific critiques that Loki made, and protecting a collective that, actually, is not a collective. 

More interestingly, Gray notes that:

The official arts, Tom Leonard argued, presents a narrow selection of works based on status, power and control.

And Loki added this trenchant comment:

Culture and media, he said, “functions as a safety valve to dissuade any meaningful critical investigation of the world we live in”.

Frankly, the rest of the article wanders around the point, observing that working class voices are often excluded, and that a consensus is built around what appear to be progressive politics, but still use the language and format of the established 'high culture'.

I'd add that any art that has state funding will have made some compromise within the parameters of what is acceptable to the funding body - as such, art can become an expression of a cultural norm, defined by the state.

It would be good if the debate between Loki and National Collective could be widened, to examine the underpinnings of the cultural industry. But this article is not enough. More like this, please.