Yes, yes, but they are a given. We have to do them. Shut up Vile, tell us what they mean to you.
Five Stars
I gave Puddles five. I would recommend his show to anyone. That is rare (my previous top scorers have always had a bit of an edge. Red Bastard was a five, but comes with a trigger warning). But I usually think a five star does a few things...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94e03/94e037e413a59fa65eebfa676511c3d25ba59d60" alt=""
Has a point.
Entertains.
Is structurally coherent.
Excellently performed.
Brings something that I haven't seen or considered before.
That last one is the five star special. In the case of Puddles, it was the exposure of rock'n'roll's self-indulgent self-pity (which he takes and builds into a moving celebration of life and love. And Kevin Costner).
Four Stars
Perm any four of five from the list above. Lucy Ribchester does a good job for Clout. She's not even in my section, but I like her writing. She argues the case for a four star.
Three Stars
This is the tough one during the Fringe. Usually it means: this is good, if you have an interest in the subject and/or company. It is usually me hedging my bets... not wanting to risk praising a show too much, but knowing some people would think it is a four star. Plus, a three star annoys the hell out of performers.
Really, the three star is why we all hate star ratings. It reads as a shrug, even if it is positive.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/befbd/befbd53072ee590eb1e7ad4dcb510f65ccc37f4f" alt=""
Contrast my review with Sally Stott's. She argues - successfully - that it is a four star show.
Three, four and two stars are all closely related... it is the place where subjectivity comes in...
On that note, I think I'll post. Come back soon for part two...
No comments :
Post a Comment